On the Consistency of Stochastic Noise Properties and Velocity Estimations from Different Analysis Strategies and Centers with Environmental Loading and CME Corrections

The analysis of the Global NFavigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series provides valuable information for geodesy and geodynamics researcFh. Precise data analysis strategies are crucial for accurately obtaining the linear velocity of GNSS stations, enabling high-precision applications of GNSS tim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3518
Hauptverfasser: Lv, Hongli, He, Xiaoxing, Hu, Shunqiang, Sun, Xiwen, Huang, Jiahui, Fernandes, Rui, Xie, Wen, Xiong, Huajiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The analysis of the Global NFavigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series provides valuable information for geodesy and geodynamics researcFh. Precise data analysis strategies are crucial for accurately obtaining the linear velocity of GNSS stations, enabling high-precision applications of GNSS time series. This study investigates the impact of different stochastic noise models on velocity estimations derived from GNSS time series, specifically under conditions of environmental loading correction and common mode error (CME) removal. By comparing data from various data centers, we find that post-correction, different analysis strategies exhibit high consistency in their noise characteristics and velocity estimation results. Across various analysis strategies, the optimal noise models were predominantly Power Law with White Noise (PLWN) and Fractional Noise with White Noise (FNWN), with the optimal noise models including COMB/JPL, COMB/SOPAC, and COMB/NGL for approximately 50% of the datasets. Most of the stations (approximately 80%) showed velocity differences below 0.3 mm/year and velocity estimation uncertainties below 0.1 mm/year. Nonetheless, variations in amplitudes and periodic signals persisted due to differences in the processing of raw GNSS observations. For instance, the NGL and JPL datasets, which were processed using GipsyX 2.1 software, showed higher amplitudes of the 5.5-day periodic signal. These findings provide a solid empirical foundation for advancing data analysis methods and enhancing the reliability of GNSS time series results in future research.
ISSN:2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI:10.3390/rs16183518