Construction of a cuproptosis-associated lncRNA prognostic signature for bladder cancer and experimental validation of cuproptosis-related lncRNA UBE2Q1-AS1

Bladder cancer (BLCA) is the ninth most common malignancy worldwide and the fourth most common cancer in men. Copper levels are significantly altered in patients with thyroid, breast, lung, cervical, ovarian, pancreatic, oral, gastric, bladder, and prostate cancers. Outcomes can be predicted by constructing signatures using lncRNA-related genes associated with outcomes.IntroductionBladder cancer (BLCA) is the ninth most common malignancy worldwide and the fourth most common cancer in men. Copper levels are significantly altered in patients with thyroid, breast, lung, cervical, ovarian, pancreatic, oral, gastric, bladder, and prostate cancers. Outcomes can be predicted by constructing signatures using lncRNA-related genes associated with outcomes.We identified lncRNAs related to outcomes, those differentially expressed in bladder cancer, and cuproptosis-related lncRNAs from TCGA. We identified the intersection to obtain 12 genes and established a prognostic risk signature consisting of eight genes using LASSO-penalized multivariate Cox analysis. We constructed a training set, performed survival analysis on the high-and low-risk groups, and performed validation in the test and full sets. There existed a substantial contrast in the likelihood of survival among the cohorts of high and low risk. An in-depth analysis of the gene mutations associated with tumors was conducted to evaluate the risk of developing cancer. We also performed gene analysis on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We conducted experimental validation on the key gene UBE2Q1-AS1 in our prognostic signature.MethodsWe identified lncRNAs related to outcomes, those differentially expressed in bladder cancer, and cuproptosis-related lncRNAs from TCGA. We identified the intersection to obtain 12 genes and established a prognostic risk signature consisting of eight genes using LASSO-penalized multivariate Cox analysis. We constructed a training set, performed survival analysis on the high-and low-risk groups, and performed validation in the test and full sets. There existed a substantial contrast in the likelihood of survival among the cohorts of high and low risk. An in-depth analysis of the gene mutations associated with tumors was conducted to evaluate the risk of developing cancer. We also performed gene analysis on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We conducted experimental validation on the key gene UBE2Q1-AS1 in our prognostic signature.The risk signature we constructed shows significant differences between t