Lower practice effects as a marker of cognitive performance and dementia risk: A literature review

Background Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring assessment & disease monitoring, 2020, Vol.12 (1), p.e12055-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Jutten, Roos J., Grandoit, Evan, Foldi, Nancy S., Sikkes, Sietske A. M., Jones, Richard N., Choi, Seo‐Eun, Lamar, Melissa L., Louden, Diana K. N., Rich, Joanne, Tommet, Douglas, Crane, Paul K., Rabin, Laura A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less‐robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost‐effective strategy to select individuals who are at‐risk for dementia for future interventions.
ISSN:2352-8729
2352-8729
DOI:10.1002/dad2.12055