Comparative analysis of actual evapotranspiration values estimated by METRIC model using LOCAL data and EEFlux for an irrigated area in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico

Landsat images combined with the METRIC model have been used in applications such as EEFlux to estimate actual evapotranspiration (ETa) in irrigated areas, with uncertainty as to whether the results are sufficiently accurate at local scales. This work compares temporally and spatially ETa estimates using Landsat imagery and the METRIC model with LOCAL measured weather data and EEFlux for an irrigated area in northern Sinaloa, Mexico, from 1995 to 2018. A regression analysis and error metrics such as coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and slope were used to compare both models. The temporal analysis results confirm that ETa differences are closely related to crop growth and that the daily mean absolute error was 1.17 mm/day. Spatial analysis showed that when using only cropland pixels without non-cropland pixels in EEFlux, the R2 increases from 0.36 to 0.73, and the RMSE decreases from 2.52 to 1.98 mm/day. Therefore, EEFlux should be limited to cropland areas, and it is suggested to exclude Landsat images close to the planting and harvesting season to reduce the differences.