Efficacy of topical anesthetics of lidocaine, benzocaine, and EMLA in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block in schoolchildren: a randomized controlled trial
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5% EMLA cream and 8% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) compared with 20% Benzocaine in children aged 6–10 years. Materials and methods This was a triple‐blinded, randomized, parallel‐group, active-contro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BDJ open 2024-11, Vol.10 (1), p.87-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5% EMLA cream and 8% lidocaine gel in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) compared with 20% Benzocaine in children aged 6–10 years.
Materials and methods
This was a triple‐blinded, randomized, parallel‐group, active-controlled trial with three arms. 45 children were randomly assigned into 3 groups. Group 1: control group, 20% benzocaine gel (
n
= 15). Group 2: 8% lidocaine gel (
n
= 15). Group 3: 5% EMLA cream (
n
= 15). Each topical anesthetic was applied in an amount of 0.3 mL using a cotton swab for 2 min, followed by IANB administration. The following primary outcome measures were considered: pulse rate, the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain assessment scale, and the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale.
Results
The mean score of the FLACC behavioral pain assessment scale in group 2 (2.20 ± 1.86) was slightly higher, but this result was not statistically significant
p
= (0.806). Regarding the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale scores, no statistically significant difference was noted between the study groups
p
= (0.593). After IANB administration, the mean pulse rate was higher in group 3 (102.40 ± 14.28). However, this difference was not statistically significant
p
= (0.351). In addition, the mean change of the pulse rate from the baseline to this time point was not statistically significant
p
= (0.638), indicating a smaller physiologic response to the painful stimulus.
Conclusion
8% lidocaine gel was not superior to 20% benzocaine nor 5% EMLA in reducing pain during IANB administration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2056-807X 2056-807X |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41405-024-00275-8 |