Comparison of DEEP-LSTM and MLP Models in Estimation of Evaporation Pan for Arid Regions

The importance of evaporation estimation in water resources and agricultural studies is undeniable. Evaporation pans (EP) are used as an indicator to determine the evaporation of lakes and reservoirs around the world due to the ease of interpreting its data. The purpose of this study is to evaluate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soft computing in civil engineering 2023-04, Vol.7 (2), p.155-175
Hauptverfasser: Amirhossein Samii, Hojat Karami, Hamidreza Ghazvinian, Amirsaeed Safari, Yashar Dadrasajirlou
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The importance of evaporation estimation in water resources and agricultural studies is undeniable. Evaporation pans (EP) are used as an indicator to determine the evaporation of lakes and reservoirs around the world due to the ease of interpreting its data. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the Long- Short Term Memory (LSTM) model to estimate evaporation from a pan and compare it with the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model in Semnan and Garmsar. For this purpose, daily meteorological data recorded between 2000 and 2018 (19 consecutive years) in Semnan and Garmsar synoptic stations were used. Minimum and maximum air temperature (Tmax, Tmin), wind speed (WS), sunshine hours (SH), air pressure (PA), relative humidity (RH) were selected as input data and evaporation data from the pan (EP) was considered as the output of the case. Also, in modeling both networks in the input section, 4 different scenarios were used. The two studied models were evaluated by the evaluation criteria of coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The results showed that among the studied scenarios, the fourth scenario (considering all input parameters) had the highest R2 and the lowest RMSE and MAE. In general, the two models performed well in predicting the rate of evaporation. Also, in both stations, the LSTM model had more R2 and less RMSE and MAE than the MLP model. The values of R2, RMSE and MAE for the best DEEP-LSTM model (LSTM4) for Semnan city were 0.9451, 1.8345 and 0.5437 and for Garmsar city 0.9204, 1.8323 and 1.3531 respectively.
ISSN:2588-2872
DOI:10.22115/scce.2023.367948.1550