Clinical and hematological findings in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) with and without Candidatus Mycoplasma haemolamae infection

Anemia is a common problem in South American camelids (SACs). Infections with Candidatus Mycoplasma haemolamae ( CMh ), a cell-wall free, hemotropic bacterium, are often suspected to be an important cause of anemia, as the pathogen infects the erythrocytes and is found in the blood of up to 30% of S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2024-08, Vol.14 (1), p.20152-12, Article 20152
Hauptverfasser: Wagener, Matthias Gerhard, Neubert, Saskia, Kiene, Frederik, Buchallik-Schregel, Johannes, Nicolaisen, Thies J., Bauer, Benjamin U., von Altrock, Alexandra, Großmann, Thekla, Polifka, Antje, Ganter, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anemia is a common problem in South American camelids (SACs). Infections with Candidatus Mycoplasma haemolamae ( CMh ), a cell-wall free, hemotropic bacterium, are often suspected to be an important cause of anemia, as the pathogen infects the erythrocytes and is found in the blood of up to 30% of SACs. The information on the clinical signs of animals infected with this pathogen vary widely. Most infections are clinically inapparent. Treatment is usually carried out with oxytetracycline. A detailed overview of the clinical and hematological findings in 13 alpacas infected with Candidatus M. haemolamae (CMh+), based on patients from our university clinic and comparing those findings with the results of 22 negative alpacas (CMh−) is provided. Assignment to both groups was based on the PCR result. No relevant clinical or hematological differences between CMh+ and CMh− were found, the clinical signs in CMh+ were usually due to comorbidities. The examination of a blood smear alone proved to be insufficient; a PCR test should be carried out to confirm or rule out an infection. A critical review of the need for antibiotic treatment on the basis of a positive test result alone is recommended.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70956-9