Comparison of Radar Signatures from a Hybrid VTOL Fixed-Wing Drone and Quad-Rotor Drone

Current studies rarely mention radar detection of hybrid vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) fixed-wing drones. We investigated radar signals of an industry-tier VTOL fixed-wing drone, TX25A, compared with the radar detection results of a quad-rotor drone, DJI Phantom 4. We used an X-band pulse-Dop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drones (Basel) 2022-05, Vol.6 (5), p.110
Hauptverfasser: Gong, Jiangkun, Li, Deren, Yan, Jun, Hu, Huiping, Kong, Deyong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Current studies rarely mention radar detection of hybrid vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) fixed-wing drones. We investigated radar signals of an industry-tier VTOL fixed-wing drone, TX25A, compared with the radar detection results of a quad-rotor drone, DJI Phantom 4. We used an X-band pulse-Doppler phased array radar to collect tracking radar data of the two drones in a coastal area near the Yellow Sea in China. The measurements indicate that TX25A had double the values of radar cross-section (RCS) and flying speed and a 2 dB larger signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR) than DJI Phantom 4. The radar signals of both drones had micro-Doppler signals or jet engine modulation (JEM) produced by the lifting rotor blades, but the Doppler modulated by the puller rotor blades of TX25A was undetectable. JEM provides radar signatures such as the rotating rate, modulated by the JEM frequency spacing interval and the number of blades for radar automatic target recognition (ATR), but also interferes with the radar tracking algorithm by suppressing the body Doppler. This work provides an a priori investigation of new VTOL fixed-wing drones and may inspire future research.
ISSN:2504-446X
2504-446X
DOI:10.3390/drones6050110