Long-Term Outcome Following Interpositional Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) includes cheilectomy or fusion for advanced arthritis. In addition, procedures to preserve or restore motion have demonstrated promising short-term results. Currently,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2016-08, Vol.1 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Aynardi, Michael, Dein, Eric J., Zahoor, Talal A., Atwater, Lara C., Schon, Lew C., Miller, Stuart D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) includes cheilectomy or fusion for advanced arthritis. In addition, procedures to preserve or restore motion have demonstrated promising short-term results. Currently, no studies have described long-term results following interpositional arthroplasty. Our institution has performed interpositional arthroplasty with autograft (joint capsule/extensor hallucis brevis) or allograft (dermal matrix) with anecdotal success for over 15 years. The purpose of this study is to report long-term outcomes following interpositional arthroplasty. Methods: All patients undergoing interpositional arthroplasty at our institution from 2000-2015 were identified and a retrospective chart review was performed. Long-term follow-up was conducted through a telephone survey to obtain survivorship, satisfaction, and functional scores. Average follow-up was 89.1 months (range, 6 to 179 months). Survivorship of the interpositional arthroplasty procedure was defined as no subsequent surgery on the hallux after the index procedure. Results: From 2000-2015, 292 interpositional arthroplasties were performed at our institution. The overall failure rate was 1.7 % (5/292), which included patients requiring revision surgery (2 patients) or subsequent fusion (3 patients). Autograft interpositional arthroplasty had a failure rate of 2.1% (2/94) and allograft interposition was 1.5% (3/198). Failure and reoperation occurred at an average of 11 months from the index procedure (range, 6-17 months). 88.7% of patients rated their overall satisfaction as excellent or good. Average preoperative VAS score was 8.2 ± 1.5 (range, 6 to 10) and 2.1 ± 1.6 (range, 0 to 7) at latest follow-up, and (79.1%) patients reported tolerance to fashionable shoes. There were no major wound complications. The most common complications were metatarsalgia (8.6%) and cock-up deformity (5.7%). Conclusion: Interpositional arthroplasty demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship and high patient satisfaction at long-term follow-up.
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011416S00056