Histological analysis of the repair of dural lesions with silicone mesh in rats subjected to experimental lesions

To evaluate inflammatory reaction, fibrosis and neovascularization in dural repairs in Wistar rats using four techniques: simple suture, bovine collagen membrane, silicon mesh and silicon mesh with suture. Thirty Wistar rats were randomized in five groups: the first was the control group, submitted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil) Brazil), 2015-10, Vol.13 (4), p.567-573
Hauptverfasser: Rosa, Fernando William Figueiredo da, Pohl, Pedro Henrique Isoldi, Mader, Ana Maria Amaral Antônio, Paiva, Carla Peluso de, Santos, Aline Amaro dos, Bianco, Bianca, Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate inflammatory reaction, fibrosis and neovascularization in dural repairs in Wistar rats using four techniques: simple suture, bovine collagen membrane, silicon mesh and silicon mesh with suture. Thirty Wistar rats were randomized in five groups: the first was the control group, submitted to dural tear only. The others underwent durotomy and simple suture, bovine collagen membrane, silicon mesh and silicon mesh with suture. Animals were euthanized and the spine was submitted to histological evaluation with a score system (ranging from zero to 3) for inflammation, neovascularization and fibrosis. Fibrosis was significantly different between simple suture and silicon mesh (p=0.005) and between simple suture and mesh with suture (p=0.015), showing that fibrosis is more intense when a foreign body is used in the repair. Bovine membrane was significantly different from mesh plus suture (p=0.011) regarding vascularization. Inflammation was significantly different between simple suture and bovine collagen membrane. Silicon mesh, compared to other commercial products available, is a possible alternative for dural repair. More studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
ISSN:1679-4508
2317-6385
2317-6385
1679-4508
DOI:10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3378