Accuracy of ZedView, the Software for Three-Dimensional Measurement and Preoperative Planning: A Basic Study

: In the field of orthopedic surgery, novel techniques of three-dimensional shape modeling using two-dimensional tomographic images are used for bone-shape measurements, preoperative planning in joint-replacement surgery, and postoperative evaluation. ZedView (three-dimensional measurement instrumen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Lithuania), 2023-05, Vol.59 (6), p.1030
Hauptverfasser: Nozaki, Asami, Imai, Norio, Funayama, Kazuhisa, Horigome, Yoji, Suzuki, Hayato, Minato, Izumi, Kobayashi, Koichi, Kawashima, Hiroyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:: In the field of orthopedic surgery, novel techniques of three-dimensional shape modeling using two-dimensional tomographic images are used for bone-shape measurements, preoperative planning in joint-replacement surgery, and postoperative evaluation. ZedView (three-dimensional measurement instrument and preoperative-planning software) had previously been developed. Our group is also using ZedView for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation for more accurate implant placement and osteotomy. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement error in this software in comparison to a three-dimensional measuring instrument (3DMI) using human bones. : The study was conducted using three bones from cadavers: the pelvic bone, femur, and tibia. Three markers were attached to each bone. Study 1: The bones with markers were fixed on the 3DMI. For each bone, the coordinates of the center point of the markers were measured, and the distances and angles between these three points were calculated and defined as "true values." Study 2: The posterior surface of the femur was placed face down on the 3DMI, and the distances from the table to the center of each marker were measured and defined as "true values." In each study, the same bone was imaged using computed tomography, measured with this software, and the measurement error from the corresponding "true values" was calculated. : Study 1: The mean diameter of the same marker using the 3DMI was 23.951 ± 0.055 mm. Comparisons between measurements using the 3DMI and this software revealed that the mean error in length was
ISSN:1648-9144
1010-660X
1648-9144
DOI:10.3390/medicina59061030