Automated deep-learning system in the assessment of MRI-visible prostate cancer: comparison of advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional technique

Deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) systems using MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection have demonstrated good performance. Nevertheless, DL-CAD systems are vulnerable to high heterogeneities in DWI, which can interfere with DL-CAD assessments and impair performance. This study a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer imaging 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.6-6, Article 6
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Lei, Fu, Caixia, Song, Xinyang, Grimm, Robert, von Busch, Heinrich, Benkert, Thomas, Kamen, Ali, Lou, Bin, Huisman, Henkjan, Tong, Angela, Penzkofer, Tobias, Choi, Moon Hyung, Shabunin, Ivan, Winkel, David, Xing, Pengyi, Szolar, Dieter, Coakley, Fergus, Shea, Steven, Szurowska, Edyta, Guo, Jing-Yi, Li, Liang, Li, Yue-Hua, Zhao, Jun-Gong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Deep-learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) systems using MRI for prostate cancer (PCa) detection have demonstrated good performance. Nevertheless, DL-CAD systems are vulnerable to high heterogeneities in DWI, which can interfere with DL-CAD assessments and impair performance. This study aims to compare PCa detection of DL-CAD between zoomed-field-of-view echo-planar DWI (z-DWI) and full-field-of-view DWI (f-DWI) and find the risk factors affecting DL-CAD diagnostic efficiency. This retrospective study enrolled 354 consecutive participants who underwent MRI including T2WI, f-DWI, and z-DWI because of clinically suspected PCa. A DL-CAD was used to compare the performance of f-DWI and z-DWI both on a patient level and lesion level. We used the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis and alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics analysis to compare the performances of DL-CAD using f- DWI and z-DWI. The risk factors affecting the DL-CAD were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. DL-CAD with z-DWI had a significantly better overall accuracy than that with f-DWI both on patient level and lesion level (AUC : 0.89 vs. 0.86; AUC : 0.86 vs. 0.76; P 
ISSN:1470-7330
1740-5025
1470-7330
DOI:10.1186/s40644-023-00527-0