A Real Time Delphi Study on the Challenges and Adverse Events to Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implant Integration and Long-Term Fixation in Limb Amputation
Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants (POI) affix artificial limbs to the body after amputation. Several adverse events challenge mainstream uptake of this technology. This study aims to achieve a consensus regarding “the challenges and adverse events to POI integration and long-term fixation in lim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prosthesis 2024-10, Vol.6 (5), p.1262-1280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Percutaneous Osseointegrated Implants (POI) affix artificial limbs to the body after amputation. Several adverse events challenge mainstream uptake of this technology. This study aims to achieve a consensus regarding “the challenges and adverse events to POI integration and long-term fixation in limb amputation”. We sought a panel of clinical experts divided by profession into surgical, clinical, or clinical academic categories. We used a real time eDelphi method to develop consensus on both the challenges and adverse event items, enabling anonymity, iteration, controlled feedback, and statistical aggregation of group responses. The full panel agreed that the most impactful items are amongst 10 key challenges and eight adverse events. Panellists were in consensus regarding the five most impactful challenges, which were, in decreasing order: patient selection, absence of a multidisciplinary team, design of the implant, soft tissue stability and an experienced surgical team. Panellists considered the five most impactful adverse events, in decreasing order, to be the following: no biological fixation, deep infection, aseptic loosening, no mechanical fixation, and implant breakage. Consensus was obtained on implant breakage and deep infection items. The proportion of consensus from the whole panel across all items was in line with the literature, and we observed an improvement in consensus once the panel was stratified based on job, expertise and implant system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2673-1592 2673-1592 |
DOI: | 10.3390/prosthesis6050091 |