Water Retention Characteristics of Superabsorbent Polymers (SAPs) Used as Soil Amendments

Superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) are used as a soil amendment for retaining water, but suitable methods for the application of SAPs have not yet been developed. Here, we characterized a variety of soil–SAP mixtures prepared using four different types of SAP in terms of their water absorption and relea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil systems 2023-06, Vol.7 (2), p.58
Hauptverfasser: Takahashi, Masamichi, Kosaka, Izumi, Ohta, Seiichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) are used as a soil amendment for retaining water, but suitable methods for the application of SAPs have not yet been developed. Here, we characterized a variety of soil–SAP mixtures prepared using four different types of SAP in terms of their water absorption and release characteristics. The teabag method was applied to characterize the soil–SAP mixtures, except for measurements of the matric potential. The results showed that the variations in water absorbency among the four SAPs in isolation became insignificant when they were mixed with sandy soils. The rates of water released from the soil–SAP mixtures under heated conditions were mitigated with decreasing water content, which prolonged the time until desiccation of the mixtures. The water absorbency of the SAPs significantly decreased in salt solutions (KCl and CaCl2), but their absorbency mostly recovered following immersion in tap water. The soil–dry SAP mixtures retained a larger amount of water than the soil–gel SAP mixtures. Swollen SAPs predominantly retained water in the range of −0.98 to −3.92 kPa, suggesting that SAP induces a transition from gravitational water to readily plant-available water by swelling itself. SAPs barely increased the amount of plant-available water in a potential range of −3.92 to −98.1 kPa, but significantly increased the soil water at
ISSN:2571-8789
2571-8789
DOI:10.3390/soilsystems7020058