Economic Model of Unipolar World Order: Divestment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Research relevance: Investment processes are not free from the influence of the political situation and relations between states. The Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) take part in a liberal segment of the global financial system and have a comparatively peripheral position as latecomers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic and Business Review 2023-09, Vol.25 (3), p.146-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Research relevance: Investment processes are not free from the influence of the political situation and relations between states. The Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) take part in a liberal segment of the global financial system and have a comparatively peripheral position as latecomers to the EU. Due to this fact their economic model is the most consistent with the principles of the liberal world order. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess and interpret the investment/divestment process in Central and Eastern European countries and comparable financial systems in the political economy and geopolitical framework to consider the divestment process as a phenomenon connected to the world-order evolution, industrial and financial globalization. Structure/methodology/approach: We propose to consider the evolution of foreign direct and portfolio investment, together with other macroeconomic indicators that may shed light on the recovery process, as capital outflows have occurred in five CEE countries since 1990 till nowadays. This period covers both the time before and after the 2008 crisis. The study of the research methodology is both qualitative and quantitative. We used existing and target indicators, such as the difference between GNI and GDP, and the surplus/deficit of accumulated capital over savings, to see the broader financial context and the impact of the foreign sector on well-being through a descriptive methodology. While using the regression analysis, we found a greater impact of foreign direct investment on capital accumulation than on savings accumulation, compared to portfolio investment, although both types of investment are positively correlated with “excess” capital accumulation. This approach allows us to make an assessment of the manifestations of the liberal model in the context of the transformation of the world order in states that are not the key beneficiaries of the world order, which include CEE. Findings: We tested theoretical developments concerning the impact of the world-order stages on investment and divestment flows in the peripheral economies, as exemplified by the former socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Instrumental financial inclusiveness toward the considered peripheral economies is limited to foreign direct investment flows in 1995–2021. Portfolio investment flows have been moving towards divestment since 2008, the beginning of the destabilization of the current world-order architect |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2335-4216 1580-0466 2335-4216 |
DOI: | 10.15458/2335-4216.1324 |