The efficacy of ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural prolotherapy versus steroids for chronic pain management in failed back surgery syndrome

Background Caudal epidural prolotherapy injection has emerged as a successful treatment for managing chronic pain. This study is a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. It assesses and compares the effectiveness of prolotherapy versus steroid injection for pain relief in cases of fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alexandria journal of medicine 2024-12, Vol.60 (1), p.238-243
Hauptverfasser: Mohamed, Yasmine Ragab Elsayed, El-Attar, Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Anwar, Dorreya Mohammed Fikry, Shehab, Ahmed Sayed Ahmed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Caudal epidural prolotherapy injection has emerged as a successful treatment for managing chronic pain. This study is a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. It assesses and compares the effectiveness of prolotherapy versus steroid injection for pain relief in cases of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). It involved randomly assigning 90 patients with FBSS to one of two equal groups: steroids or prolotherapy. The VAS was used to measure pain as the primary outcome, while disability was measured by the Oswestry disability index (ODI). McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and complications were recorded as secondary outcomes.Results The VAS improved significantly from the baseline in both groups at all follow-up periods (p 
ISSN:2090-5068
2090-5076
DOI:10.1080/20905068.2024.2387884