CFD comparison of 2D and 3D aerodynamics in H-Darrieus prototype wake
•2D and 3D CFD modeling of the aerodynamic performance of H-Darrieus turbine.•Use of the mosaic mesh technique for the 3D grid generation.•Numerical validation of k−ω SST turbulence model.•Comparative assessment between our 2D and 3D CFD URANS calculations.•Description of the complex vortex flow str...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | e-Prime 2023-06, Vol.4, p.100178, Article 100178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •2D and 3D CFD modeling of the aerodynamic performance of H-Darrieus turbine.•Use of the mosaic mesh technique for the 3D grid generation.•Numerical validation of k−ω SST turbulence model.•Comparative assessment between our 2D and 3D CFD URANS calculations.•Description of the complex vortex flow structures developed in the H-Darrieus wake.
[Display omitted]
In the present study, a comparative assessment is conducted to evaluate the outcomes derived from two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models utilizing the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) approach. The focus lies on the aerodynamic performance of the H-Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine, which has been the subject of numerous numerical investigations since 2010. The k−ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is employed to replicate the flow structures evolving in the turbine wake.
The maximum power coefficients attained through 2D and 3D modeling are reported as Cp=0.4016 and Cp=0.5734, respectively, at a tip speed ratio (λ) of 3.0976. The maximum 2D and 3D absolute errors, corresponding to the evaluation of the power coefficients, are determined to be 14.9714% and 29.1582%, respectively. These errors are calculated at λ=2.5183 and λ=3.0976. The parametric study conducted herein reveals that the range of the power coefficient enhancement, considering 3D aerodynamic effects, surpasses that obtained from 2D calculations. In 3D modeling, this range is delineated between λ=1.85 and λ=3.10, whereas, in 2D modeling, it is defined by the interval bounded by λ=2.05 and λ=3.10. The essential contours for comparing the 2D and 3D approaches and for characterizing the flow structures developing around the H-Darrieus turbine are generated and analyzed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2772-6711 2772-6711 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prime.2023.100178 |