Breaking Down Walls and Building Bridges: A Study of Cross-Racial Interactions Across Two Predominantly White Campuses
We examined predictors of self-reported cross-racial interactions (CRIs) by exploring ego networks for 355 Black and White undergraduates at two predominantly White institutions (PWIs). One PWI was 67% White, and the other PWI was only 50% White. Institution, 1st year status, and racial homogeneity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal committed to social change on race and ethnicity 2019-01, Vol.3 (2), p.2-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We examined predictors of self-reported cross-racial interactions (CRIs) by exploring ego networks for 355 Black and White undergraduates at two predominantly White institutions (PWIs). One PWI was 67% White, and the other PWI was only 50% White. Institution, 1st year status, and racial homogeneity of student network were significant predictors of CRI. Students at the less structurally diverse university (that was 67% White) reported fewer CRIs; students with racially homogeneous networks (i.e., where all alters/connections were the same race as each other) also reported fewer CRIs. In contrast, 1st year students reported a higher number of CRIs. Network homophily (i.e., where alters/connections in a network were all the same race as ego--the student him or herself) did not significantly predict CRIs, and neither did parent education or ego’s (i.e., the students’) race or gender. There was one significant difference by race; however, a higher percentage of White students had racially homogeneous networks. The importance of structural, interactional, and curricular diversity in higher education is discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2642-2387 2642-2387 |
DOI: | 10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2017.3.2.1-23 |