Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for open radical cystectomy: A controlled study

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of loco‐regional anaesthesia and to compare perioperative outcomes between loco‐regional and standard general anaesthesia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). Patients and Methods A single‐surgeon cohort of 60 consecutive pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJUI Compass 2024-01, Vol.5 (1), p.101-108
Hauptverfasser: Galletta, Maria, De Pasquale, Maria, Buttitta, Alessandro, Viganò, Silvia, Mucciardi, Giuseppe, Giannarini, Gianluca, Ficarra, Vincenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of loco‐regional anaesthesia and to compare perioperative outcomes between loco‐regional and standard general anaesthesia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). Patients and Methods A single‐surgeon cohort of 60 consecutive patients with bladder cancer undergoing ORC with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol between May 2020 and December 2021 was analysed. A study group of 15 patients operated on under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia was compared with a control group of 45 patients receiving standard general anaesthesia. Intraoperative outcomes were haemodynamic stability, estimated blood loss, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion rate, and anaesthesia time. Postoperative outcomes were pain assessment 24 h after surgery, time to mobilisation, return to oral diet, time to bowel function recovery, length of stay and rate of 90‐day complications. Results No patients required conversion from loco‐regional to general anaesthesia. All patients in both groups were haemodynamically stable. No significant differences between groups were observed for all other intraoperative outcomes, except for a shorter anaesthesia time in the study versus control group (250 vs. 290 min, p = 0.01). Pain visual score 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the study versus control group (0 vs. 2, p 
ISSN:2688-4526
2688-4526
DOI:10.1002/bco2.221