Predicting photooxidant concentrations in aerosol liquid water based on laboratory extracts of ambient particles
Aerosol liquid water (ALW) is a unique reaction medium, but its chemistry is poorly understood. For example, little is known of photooxidant concentrations - including hydroxyl radicals (.sup.â« OH), singlet molecular oxygen (.sup.1 O2*), and oxidizing triplet excited states of organic matter (.sup....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2023-08, Vol.23 (15), p.8805-8821 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aerosol liquid water (ALW) is a unique reaction medium, but its chemistry is poorly understood. For example, little is known of photooxidant concentrations - including hydroxyl radicals (.sup.⫠OH), singlet molecular oxygen (.sup.1 O2*), and oxidizing triplet excited states of organic matter (.sup.3 C.sup.*) - even though they likely drive much of ALW chemistry. Due to the very limited water content of particles, it is difficult to quantify oxidant concentrations in ALW directly. To predict these values, we measured photooxidant concentrations in illuminated aqueous particle extracts as a function of dilution and used the resulting oxidant kinetics to extrapolate to ALW conditions. We prepared dilution series from two sets of particles collected in Davis, California: one from winter (WIN) and one from summer (SUM). Both periods are influenced by biomass burning, with dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the extracts ranging from 10 to 495 mg C L.sup.-1 . In the winter sample, the .sup.⫠OH concentration is independent of particle mass concentration, with an average value of 5.0 (± 2.2) x 10.sup.-15 M, while in summer .sup.⫠OH increases with DOC in the range (0.4-7.7) x 10.sup.-15 M. In both winter and summer samples, .sup.3 C.sup.* concentrations increase rapidly with particle mass concentrations in the extracts and then plateau under more concentrated conditions, with a range of (0.2-7) x 10.sup.-13 M. WIN and SUM have the same range of .sup.1 O2* concentrations, (0.2-8.5) x 10.sup.-12 M, but in WIN the .sup.1 O2* concentration increases linearly with DOC, while in SUM .sup.1 O2* approaches a plateau. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
DOI: | 10.5194/acp-23-8805-2023 |