Clinical Profile, Practice Pattern, and Outcomes With First-Line Therapy in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer: Real-World Data From Resource-Constrained Settings
ALK inhibitors are one of the success stories in precision medicine for treating patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, developing countries have substantial constraints in using ALK inhibitors, with limited data from India. An audit of a prospectively collected database of patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JTO clinical and research reports 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.100443, Article 100443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ALK inhibitors are one of the success stories in precision medicine for treating patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, developing countries have substantial constraints in using ALK inhibitors, with limited data from India.
An audit of a prospectively collected database of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated from January 2013 to March 2018 was conducted. The SPSS version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis.
A total of 441 patients were available for analysis; 62.5% were males, median age was 50 (range: 19–75) years, and 78.3% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. When all the lines of therapies were included in the analysis, ALK inhibitors could be used in 379 (85.9%) of the total ALK-positive patients and 292 patients (66.2%) received ALK inhibitors in the first line in any strategy. The major reason for not starting ALK inhibitors upfront was financial constraints in 69% of the patients. The median progression-free survival on first-line therapy for the entire cohort was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2–15.9), with a significant difference between patients receiving ALK inhibitor in first line in any strategy versus not in first line (17.2 mo [95% CI: 14.5–19.9] versus 5.9 mo [95% CI: 4.2–7.6], p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2666-3643 2666-3643 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100443 |