The effects of Trendelenburg Position on Patient Care during Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Low quality of surgical field is a common problem during open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Aim: This study was performed aimed to survey the effects of Trendelenburg position on the quality of surgical field, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), heart rate (HR), regional cerebral oxygen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evidence based care : quarterly journal of Mashhad School of Nursing and Midwifery 2023-04, Vol.13 (1), p.70-77
Hauptverfasser: Behzad Imani, Hanieh Bahadori, Salman Khazaie, Mohammad Ali Amirzargar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; per
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Low quality of surgical field is a common problem during open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Aim: This study was performed aimed to survey the effects of Trendelenburg position on the quality of surgical field, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), heart rate (HR), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) and cognitive function in patients undergoing ORP. Method: This randomized controlled clinical trial study was done on 60 patients candidates for ORP in Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Hamadan in 2022. Patients were selected by the convenience sampling method and were divided into two intervention and control groups using the random blocking method. In intervention group, patients were placed in a 15° head-down tilt before surgery. The control group was remained in a sleeping position on the back during surgery. The surgical field quality was assessed after surgery. The MABP, HR, and rSO2 were assessed after anesthesia induction, after positioning, and consecutively in 30-minute intervals during the surgery. Results: The mean age was 60.93±4.24 years. A significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the surgeon's satisfaction with the surgical field quality (P=0.04). There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding surgery time (t=-3.00, P=0.004). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of MABP, HR, and rSO2 in either of the measurements (P>0.05). Implications for Practice: It is recommended to use Trendelenburg position, as a safe position, to improve exposure to the pelvis during surgery.
ISSN:2008-2487
2008-370X
DOI:10.22038/ebcj.2023.68655.2802