Reasons for Guideline Nonadherence at Heart Failure Discharge

Background Cardiology has advanced guideline development and quality measurement. Recognizing the substantial benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy, this study aims to measure and explain apparent deviations in heart failure ( HF ) guideline adherence by clinicians at hospital discharge and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Heart Association 2018-08, Vol.7 (15), p.e008789-e008789
Hauptverfasser: Gilstrap, Lauren G, Stevenson, Lynne W, Small, Roy, Parambi, Ron, Hamershock, Rose, Greenberg, Jeffrey, Carr, Christina, Ghazinouri, Roya, Rathman, Lisa, Han, Elizabeth, Mehra, Mandeep R, Desai, Akshay S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Cardiology has advanced guideline development and quality measurement. Recognizing the substantial benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy, this study aims to measure and explain apparent deviations in heart failure ( HF ) guideline adherence by clinicians at hospital discharge and describe any impact on readmission rates. Methods and Results The extent of decongestion and prescription of neurohormonal therapy were recorded prospectively for 226 HF discharges, including 132 (58%) from an academic hospital and 94 (42%) from a community hospital. Among all discharges, 25% were discharged with residual congestion (30% academic versus 18% community, P=0.070). Among discharges of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, 37% (45% academic versus 18% community, P
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.008789