Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium , Mycobacterium intracellulare , and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories
: It has been suggested that , , and have differential drug susceptibility patterns. We prospectively analyzed and compared the drug susceptibility patterns among these species over an 8.5-year period. : A microdilution method (Slomyco ) was performed for drug susceptibility testing of 402 , 273 , a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antibiotics (Basel) 2022-12, Vol.12 (1), p.64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | : It has been suggested that
,
, and
have differential drug susceptibility patterns. We prospectively analyzed and compared the drug susceptibility patterns among these species over an 8.5-year period.
: A microdilution method (Slomyco
) was performed for drug susceptibility testing of 402
, 273
, and 139
clinical isolates.
:
showed significantly higher resistance to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ethambutol, streptomycin, linezolid, cotrimoxazole, and clarithromycin.
also showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) than
and
against all drugs except ethionamide, to which
and
showed greater resistance.
: Our series demonstrated differential drug resistance patterns among the most frequent
complex species.
was more resistant than
and
versus eight antibiotics and showed greater MIC values to most of the antibiotics studied. These data suggest that knowledge of the local distribution and susceptibility profiles of these pathogens is essential for adequate clinical management. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2079-6382 2079-6382 |
DOI: | 10.3390/antibiotics12010064 |