Deafferented controllers: a fundamental failure mechanism in cortical neuroprosthetic systems

Brain-machine interface (BMI) research assumes that patients with disconnected neural pathways could naturally control a prosthetic device by volitionally modulating sensorimotor cortical activity usually responsible for movement coordination. However, computational approaches to motor control chall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 2015-07, Vol.9, p.186
Hauptverfasser: Galán, Ferran, Baker, Stuart N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Brain-machine interface (BMI) research assumes that patients with disconnected neural pathways could naturally control a prosthetic device by volitionally modulating sensorimotor cortical activity usually responsible for movement coordination. However, computational approaches to motor control challenge this view. This article examines the predictions of optimal feedback control (OFC) theory on the effects that loss of motor output and sensory feedback have on the normal generation of motor commands. Example simulations of unimpaired, totally disconnected, and deafferented controllers illustrate that by neglecting the dynamic interplay between motor commands, state estimation, feedback and behavior, current BMI systems face translational challenges rooted in a debatable assumption and experimental models of limited validity.
ISSN:1662-5153
1662-5153
DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00186