Towards monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in the environment: For what reasons, how to implement it, and what are the data needs?

[Display omitted] •Background levels of environmental antimicrobial resistance need to be established.•How different AMR monitoring methods compare to each other must be determined.•Locations and type of environments relevant for AMR monitoring must be identified.•High-risk environments for transmis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment international 2023-08, Vol.178, p.108089-108089, Article 108089
Hauptverfasser: Bengtsson-Palme, Johan, Abramova, Anna, Berendonk, Thomas U., Coelho, Luis Pedro, Forslund, Sofia K., Gschwind, Rémi, Heikinheimo, Annamari, Jarquín-Díaz, Víctor Hugo, Khan, Ayaz Ali, Klümper, Uli, Löber, Ulrike, Nekoro, Marmar, Osińska, Adriana D., Ugarcina Perovic, Svetlana, Pitkänen, Tarja, Rødland, Ernst Kristian, Ruppé, Etienne, Wasteson, Yngvild, Wester, Astrid Louise, Zahra, Rabaab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Background levels of environmental antimicrobial resistance need to be established.•How different AMR monitoring methods compare to each other must be determined.•Locations and type of environments relevant for AMR monitoring must be identified.•High-risk environments for transmission of resistance need to be defined.•Methods to detect novel resistance genes are needed. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to human and animal health and well-being. To understand AMR dynamics, it is important to monitor resistant bacteria and resistance genes in all relevant settings. However, while monitoring of AMR has been implemented in clinical and veterinary settings, comprehensive monitoring of AMR in the environment is almost completely lacking. Yet, the environmental dimension of AMR is critical for understanding the dissemination routes and selection of resistant microorganisms, as well as the human health risks related to environmental AMR. Here, we outline important knowledge gaps that impede implementation of environmental AMR monitoring. These include lack of knowledge of the ‘normal’ background levels of environmental AMR, definition of high-risk environments for transmission, and a poor understanding of the concentrations of antibiotics and other chemical agents that promote resistance selection. Furthermore, there is a lack of methods to detect resistance genes that are not already circulating among pathogens. We conclude that these knowledge gaps need to be addressed before routine monitoring for AMR in the environment can be implemented on a large scale. Yet, AMR monitoring data bridging different sectors is needed in order to fill these knowledge gaps, which means that some level of national, regional and global AMR surveillance in the environment must happen even without all scientific questions answered. With the possibilities opened up by rapidly advancing technologies, it is time to fill these knowledge gaps. Doing so will allow for specific actions against environmental AMR development and spread to pathogens and thereby safeguard the health and wellbeing of humans and animals.
ISSN:0160-4120
1873-6750
1873-6750
DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108089