Nitrogen rate is more important than irrigation rate in mitigating nitrogen leaching in flood-irrigated maize: A 6-year lysimeter experiment

[Display omitted] •Nitrogen and irrigation rates can be sharply reduced without maize yield reduction.•Integrated chemical and organic N fertilizers contributes to plant N uptake.•Irrigation amount rather than N rate primarily mediates residual soil nitrate.•Fertilizer-N rate is more important than...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoderma 2024-07, Vol.447, p.116940, Article 116940
Hauptverfasser: Hou, Liyao, Liu, Xiaotong, Luo, Jianhang, Zhao, Ying, Zhang, Xuejun, Lei, Qiuliang, Liu, Hongbin, Zou, Peng, Liu, Zhanjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Nitrogen and irrigation rates can be sharply reduced without maize yield reduction.•Integrated chemical and organic N fertilizers contributes to plant N uptake.•Irrigation amount rather than N rate primarily mediates residual soil nitrate.•Fertilizer-N rate is more important than irrigation rate in regulating N leaching. Excessive nitrogen (N) fertilization and irrigation prevail in irrigated agriculture worldwide. However, little information is available that systematically evaluates grain yield, plant N uptake, residual soil NO3−-N (RSN), and N leaching under different irrigation–N regimes in an irrigated maize production system. To address such agronomic and environmental issues, a 6-year in situ lysimeter field trial was conducted in the Hetao Irrigation District of China with five treatments: 1) conventional irrigation (3,900 m3/ha) and local farmer fertilizer N rate (490 kg ha−1) (CON); 2) conventional irrigation and the recommended fertilizer N rate (420 kg ha−1) (RN); 3) deficit irrigation (2,730 m3/ha) and the recommended fertilizer N rate (SRN); 4) deficit irrigation and the recommended fertilizer N rate (with ∼ 10 % organic fertilizer N substitution) (SMN); and 5) conventional irrigation and controlled-release N fertilizer (270 kg ha−1) (CRF). Maize yield was not significantly different across treatments in 2015–2020. Averaged across years, SMN, SRN, and CRF significantly increased plant N uptake compared with that in CON by 28.84 %, 19.15 %, and 17.53 %, respectively. Residual soil NO3−-N at 0–90 cm was ranked as SRN > CON ≈ SMN > RN > CRF, whereas cumulative N in leachate from 2015–2020 (Nloss) in CON was 86.2 % to 187.1 % higher than that in other treatments. The Nloss in SRN was equivalent to that in RN and SMN, but Nloss in SMN decreased significantly compared with that in RN, indicating additive benefits of deficit irrigation and organic input on reducing N leaching. Structural equation modelling revealed that irrigation had greater effects on plant N uptake than those of fertilization, whereas N rate had a greater total effect on N leaching than that of irrigation. Overall, rampant excessive irrigation and N fertilization by farmers can be substantially reduced while maintaining grain yield and mitigating N leaching loss, with further benefits gained by applying controlled-release N fertilizer and manure in irrigated maize production.
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116940