Comparison of Selection Criteria for Model Selection of Support Vector Machine on Physiological Data with Inter-Subject Variance

Support vector machines (SVMs) utilize hyper-parameters for classification. Model selection (MS) is an essential step in the construction of the SVM classifier as it involves the identification of the appropriate parameters. Several selection criteria have been proposed for MS, but their usefulness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2022-02, Vol.12 (3), p.1749
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Minho, Jeong, Jae Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Support vector machines (SVMs) utilize hyper-parameters for classification. Model selection (MS) is an essential step in the construction of the SVM classifier as it involves the identification of the appropriate parameters. Several selection criteria have been proposed for MS, but their usefulness is limited for physiological data exhibiting inter-subject variance (ISV) that makes different characteristics between training and test data. To identify an effective solution for the constraint, this study considered a leave-one-subject-out cross validation-based selection criterion (LSSC) with six well-known selection criteria and compared their effectiveness. Nine classification problems were examined for the comparison, and the MS results of each selection criterion were obtained and analyzed. The results showed that the SVM model selected by the LSSC yielded the highest average classification accuracy among all selection criteria in the nine problems. The average accuracy was 2.96% higher than that obtained with the conventional K-fold cross validation-based selection criterion. In addition, the advantage of the LSSC was more evident for data with larger ISV. Thus, the results of this study can help optimize SVM classifiers for physiological data and are expected to be useful for the analysis of physiological data to develop various medical decision systems.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app12031749