Predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant or conversion chemoimmunotherapy in stage IB–III non‐small cell lung cancer patients using radiomic features

BackgroundTo develop a radiomics model based on chest computed tomography (CT) for the prediction of a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant or conversion chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with stage IB–III NSCLC who receive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thoracic cancer 2023-10, Vol.14 (28), p.2869-2876
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Nong, Yue, Hai‐Lin, Zhang, Bai‐Hua, Chen, Juan, Chu, Qian, Wang, Jian‐Xin, Yu, Xiao‐Ping, Jian, Lian, Bin, Ya‐Wen, Liu, Si‐Ye, Liu, Jin, Zeng, Liang, Yang, Hai‐Yan, Zhou, Chun‐Hua, Jiang, Wen‐Juan, Liu, Li, Zhang, Yong‐Chang, Xiong, Yi, Wang, Zhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundTo develop a radiomics model based on chest computed tomography (CT) for the prediction of a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant or conversion chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with stage IB–III NSCLC who received neoadjuvant or conversion CIT between September 2019 and July 2021 at Hunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya Hospital, and Union Hospital were retrospectively collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to screen features. Then, model 1 (five radiomics features before CIT), model 2 (four radiomics features after CIT and before surgery) and model 3 were constructed for the prediction of pCR. Model 3 included all nine features of model 1 and 2 and was later named the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy-related pathological response prediction model (NACIP).ResultsThis study included 110 patients: 77 in the training set and 33 in the validation set. Thirty-nine (35.5%) patients achieved a pCR. Model 1 showed area under the curve (AUC) = 0.65, 64% accuracy, 71% specificity, and 50% sensitivity, while model 2 displayed AUC = 0.81, 73% accuracy, 62% specificity, and 92% sensitivity. In comparison, NACIP yielded a good predictive value, with an AUC of 0.85, 81% accuracy, 81% specificity, and 83% sensitivity in the validation set.ConclusionNACIP may be a potential model for the early prediction of pCR in patients with NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant/conversion CIT.
ISSN:1759-7706
1759-7714
DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.15052