Assessing the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib and everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: insights from the RELIEVE study's analysis of heavily pretreated patients

The treatment of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents an unmet medical need and is still challenging. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination and the secondary objective was the toxicity profile...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic advances in urology 2024-01, Vol.16, p.17562872241244574-17562872241244574
Hauptverfasser: Buti, Sebastiano, Olivari, Alessandro, Masini, Cristina, Bimbatti, Davide, Sartori, Donata, Ermacora, Paola, Cattrini, Carlo, Vitale, Maria Giuseppa, Rossi, Ernesto, Mucciarini, Claudia, Rizzo, Mimma, Sisani, Michele, Santoni, Matteo, Roviello, Giandomenico, Mollica, Veronica, Conteduca, Vincenza, Grillone, Francesco, Cinausero, Marika, Prati, Giuseppe, Atzori, Francesco, Stellato, Marco, Massari, Francesco, Bersanelli, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The treatment of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents an unmet medical need and is still challenging. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination and the secondary objective was the toxicity profile of this combination. We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study examining mRCC patients pre-treated with one or more lines of therapy among different cancer centers in Italy. The study included patients who received the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus as either a second-line treatment or beyond. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and toxicity profile. In addition, we explored the potential relationship between treatment effectiveness and clinical and laboratory parameters. In all, 33 patients were assessed, the median age was 60 years, 57% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1-2 and. 63% received ⩾ 3 prior lines of therapy. 62% were 'intermediate risk' according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium and 30% were 'poor risk'. The RR was 42% (no complete response), 18% stable disease. Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.8-19.9), median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 0.6-30.8), and median TTF was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.8-16.6). A shorter OS was significantly associated with lymph node metastases (  = 0.043, 95% CI), neutrophils/ lymphocytes ratio (NLR) ⩾ 3 (  = 0.007), hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio cutoff value
ISSN:1756-2872
1756-2880
DOI:10.1177/17562872241244574