Analyzing drying characteristics and modeling of thin layers of peppermint leaves under hot-air and infrared treatments

•Limitations of hot-air drying encouraged development of alternative drying methods such as infrared drying.•Optimization of drying process will be made possible by the selection best model that can describe the process.•Infrared radiation dried peppermint leaves more efficiently than hot-air.•Hot-a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information processing in agriculture 2017-06, Vol.4 (2), p.128-139
Hauptverfasser: Miraei Ashtiani, Seyed-Hassan, Salarikia, Alireza, Golzarian, Mahmood Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Limitations of hot-air drying encouraged development of alternative drying methods such as infrared drying.•Optimization of drying process will be made possible by the selection best model that can describe the process.•Infrared radiation dried peppermint leaves more efficiently than hot-air.•Hot-air and infrared drying treatments exhibited the lowest and highest effective moisture diffusivity, respectively.•Activation energy for both drying processes was also determined. The drying kinetics of peppermint leaves was studied to determine the best drying method for them. Two drying methods include hot-air and infrared techniques, were employed. Three different temperatures (30, 40, 50°C) and air velocities (0.5, 1, 1.5m/s) were selected for the hot-air drying process. Three levels of infrared intensity (1500, 3000, 4500W/m2), emitter-sample distance (10, 15, 20cm) and air speed (0.5, 1, 1.5m/s) were used for the infrared drying technique. According to the results, drying had a falling rate over time. Drying kinetics of peppermint leaves was explained and compared using three mathematical models. To determine coefficients of these models, non-linear regression analysis was used. The models were evaluated in terms of reduced chi-square (χ2), root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) values of experimental and predicted moisture ratios. Statistical analyses indicated that the model with the best fitness in explaining the drying behavior of peppermint samples was the Logarithmic model for hot-air drying and Midilli model for infrared drying. Moisture transfer in peppermint leaves was also described using Fick’s diffusion model. The lowest effective moisture diffusivity (1.096×10−11m2/s) occurred during hot-air drying at 30°C using 0.5m/s, whereas its highest value (5.928×10−11m2/s) belonged to infrared drying using 4500W/m2 infrared intensity, 0.5m/s airflow velocity and 10cm emitter-sample distance. The activation energy for infrared and hot-air drying were ranged from 0.206 to 0.439W/g, and from 21.476 to 27.784kJ/mol, respectively.
ISSN:2214-3173
2214-3173
DOI:10.1016/j.inpa.2017.03.001