Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate activity in the tactile suppression network

•We examined BOLD modulations during tactile suppression in a reach task.•Stronger behavioral and neural suppression during somatosensory vs. external reaches.•Suppression during somatosensory reaches linked to deactivations in somatosensory areas.•Suppression during external reaches linked to deact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2021-08, Vol.236, p.118000-118000, Article 118000
Hauptverfasser: Arikan, Belkis Ezgi, Voudouris, Dimitris, Voudouri-Gertz, Hanna, Sommer, Jens, Fiehler, Katja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We examined BOLD modulations during tactile suppression in a reach task.•Stronger behavioral and neural suppression during somatosensory vs. external reaches.•Suppression during somatosensory reaches linked to deactivations in somatosensory areas.•Suppression during external reaches linked to deactivations in the cerebellum.•Deactivations in SMA arise during somatosensory vs. external reaches.•The strength of suppression depends on reach-relevant somatosensory feedback signals. Somatosensory signals on a moving limb are typically suppressed. This results mainly from a predictive mechanism that generates an efference copy, and attenuates the predicted sensory consequences of that movement. Sensory feedback is, however, important for movement control. Behavioral studies show that the strength of suppression on a moving limb increases during somatosensory reaching, when reach-relevant somatosensory signals from the target limb can be additionally used to plan and guide the movement, leading to increased reliability of sensorimotor predictions. It is still unknown how this suppression is neurally implemented. In this fMRI study, participants reached to a somatosensory (static finger) or an external target (touch-screen) without vision. To probe suppression, participants detected brief vibrotactile stimuli on their moving finger shortly before reach onset. As expected, sensitivity to probes was reduced during reaching compared to baseline (resting), and this suppression was stronger during somatosensory than external reaching. BOLD activation associated with suppression was also modulated by the reach target: relative to baseline, processing of probes during somatosensory reaching led to distinct BOLD deactivations in somatosensory regions (postcentral gyrus, supramarginal gyrus-SMG) whereas probes during external reaching led to deactivations in the cerebellum. In line with the behavioral results, we also found additional deactivations during somatosensory relative to external reaching in the supplementary motor area, a region linked with sensorimotor prediction. Somatosensory reaching was also linked with increased functional connectivity between the left SMG and the right parietal operculum along with the right anterior insula. We show that somatosensory processing on a moving limb is reduced when additional reach-relevant feedback signals from the target limb contribute to the movement, by down-regulating activation in regions associated with predictive an
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118000