Internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane flap insertion for treating large idiopathic macular holes: A review of literature
•Literature review on internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic macular hole (MH) showed baseline mean visual acuity (VA) of LogMAR 0.7–1.55.•Literature review on ILM peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic MH demonstrated post-o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2024-12, Vol.50, p.104359, Article 104359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Literature review on internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic macular hole (MH) showed baseline mean visual acuity (VA) of LogMAR 0.7–1.55.•Literature review on ILM peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic MH demonstrated post-operative mean VA improvement up to LogMAR 0.25—0.89.•There is no t-value for categorical variables comparison between the two groups using Fisher's exact test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-1000 1873-1597 1873-1597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104359 |