Internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane flap insertion for treating large idiopathic macular holes: A review of literature

•Literature review on internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic macular hole (MH) showed baseline mean visual acuity (VA) of LogMAR 0.7–1.55.•Literature review on ILM peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic MH demonstrated post-o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2024-12, Vol.50, p.104359, Article 104359
Hauptverfasser: So, Shannon Ching Yau, Au, Sunny, Chi Lik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Literature review on internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic macular hole (MH) showed baseline mean visual acuity (VA) of LogMAR 0.7–1.55.•Literature review on ILM peel versus flap insertion for large (>400um) idiopathic MH demonstrated post-operative mean VA improvement up to LogMAR 0.25—0.89.•There is no t-value for categorical variables comparison between the two groups using Fisher's exact test.
ISSN:1572-1000
1873-1597
1873-1597
DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104359