Acalabrutinib Versus Investigator's Choice in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final ASCEND Trial Results

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ASCEND is the pivotal phase 3 study of acalabrutinib versus investigator's choice of idelalisib plus rituximab (IdR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed/r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HemaSphere 2022-12, Vol.6 (12), p.e801-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ghia, Paolo, Pluta, Andrzej, Wach, Małgorzata, Lysak, Daniel, Šimkovič, Martin, Kriachok, Iryna, Illés, Árpád, Serna, Javier, Dolan, Sean, Campbell, Philip, Musuraca, Gerardo, Jacob, Abraham, Avery, Eric J., Lee, Jae Hoon, Usenko, Ganna, Wang, Min Hui, Yu, Ting, Jurczak, Wojciech
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ASCEND is the pivotal phase 3 study of acalabrutinib versus investigator's choice of idelalisib plus rituximab (IdR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. In the primary ASCEND analysis (median 16.1‐month follow‐up), acalabrutinib showed superior efficacy with an acceptable tolerability profile versus IdR/BR; here, we report final ~4 year follow‐up results. Patients with R/R CLL received oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or investigator's choice of IdR or BR. A total of 310 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 155; IdR, n = 119; BR, n = 36) were enrolled. At median follow‐up of 46.5 months (acalabrutinib) and 45.3 months (IdR/BR), acalabrutinib significantly prolonged investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS) versus IdR/BR (median, not reached [NR] vs 16.8 months; P < 0.001); 42‐month PFS rates were 62% (acalabrutinib) versus 19% (IdR/BR). Median overall survival (OS) was NR (both arms); 42‐month OS rates were 78% (acalabrutinib) versus 65% (IdR/BR). Adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 23%, 67%, and 17% of patients in the acalabrutinib, IdR, and BR arms, respectively. Events of clinical interest (acalabrutinib vs IdR/BR) included all‐grade atrial fibrillation/flutter (8% vs 3%), all‐grade hypertension (8% vs 5%), all‐grade major hemorrhage (3% vs 3%), grade ≥3 infections (29% vs 29%), and second primary malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (7% vs 2%). At ~4 years follow‐up, acalabrutinib maintained favorable efficacy versus standard‐of‐care regimens and a consistent tolerability profile in patients with R/R CLL.
ISSN:2572-9241
2572-9241
DOI:10.1097/HS9.0000000000000801