A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recognition of stroke in the emergency department (ROSIER) scale

Background The present study aims to evaluate the performance and the clinical applicability of the Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Department (ROSIER) scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Electronic databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched between 1st January 2005 (when...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC neurology 2020-08, Vol.20 (1), p.1-304, Article 304
Hauptverfasser: Han, Fei, Zuo, Chao, Zheng, Guodong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The present study aims to evaluate the performance and the clinical applicability of the Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Department (ROSIER) scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Electronic databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched between 1st January 2005 (when ROSIER developed) and 8th May 2020. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the ROSIER scale were included. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were combined using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Fagan nomogram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the ROSIER scale. Results A total of 14 studies incorporating 15 datasets were included in this meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.91], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52-0.77), 13.86 (95% CI, 7.67-25.07) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90), respectively. Given the pre-test probability of 60.0%, Fagan nomogram suggested the post-test probability was increased to 79% when the ROSIER was positive. In comparison, it was decreased to 22% when ROSIER was negative. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of ROSIER in the European population was higher than that in Asia. In contrast, the pooled specificity was not significantly different between them. Moreover, results also suggested the male-to-female ratio [less than or equai to] 1.0 subgroup, prehospital setting subgroup, and other trained medical personnel subgroup had significantly higher sensitivity compared with their counterparts. At the same time, no significant differences were found in the pooled specificity between them. Conclusions ROSIER is a valid scale with high clinical applicability, which has not only good diagnostic accuracy in Europe but also shows excellent performance in Asia. Moreover, the ROSIER scale exhibits good applicability in prehospital settings with other trained medical personnel. Keywords: Validation studies, Review, meta-analysis, ROSIER, stroke
ISSN:1471-2377
1471-2377
DOI:10.1186/s12883-020-01841-x