Ankle reflex and neurological symptom score: a primary level screening method for diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Herein, we aimed to develop an easily available and efficient screening method for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) suitable for primary care settings, emphasizing simplicity, speed, and accuracy. Nerve conduction studies were conducted on 214 patients with diabetes, encompassing the outcomes of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine Journal 2024, Vol.71(2), pp.129-137
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Xueya, Li, Mengyuan, Xie, Hui, Sun, Ting, Lu, Liang, Li, Sumei, Sun, Yining, Ma, Zuchang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Herein, we aimed to develop an easily available and efficient screening method for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) suitable for primary care settings, emphasizing simplicity, speed, and accuracy. Nerve conduction studies were conducted on 214 patients with diabetes, encompassing the outcomes of five distinct assessments: diabetic neuropathy symptom (DNS), vibration perception threshold (VPT), and nerve screening. The diagnostic accuracy of the VPT and nerve screening was evaluated by comparing them with that of the nerve conduction study. To assess diagnostic efficacy, various combinations were examined, including DNS combined with VPT, pain, temperature, touch, and ankle reflex. The diagnostic performance of DNS was superior to that of the five neurological screening items and VPT, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.68, 0.81, and 0.73, respectively. Among the two combined methods, “DNS + ankle reflex” was identified as having the highest diagnostic value, with an area under the curve, a sensitivity, a specificity, and an accuracy of 0.81, 0.89, 0.70, and 0.80, respectively. Furthermore, a combination of “DNS + ankle reflex + touch + pain + VPT” achieved the best performance among the five combinations, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.85, 0.93, 0.68, and 0.81, respectively. The combination of DNS, ankle reflex, touch, pain, and VPT methods showed the highest diagnostic value for DPN. However, considering factors including accuracy, time, and economic cost, we recommend using a simpler combination of DNS and ankle reflex for large-scale screening of patients with DPN.
ISSN:0918-8959
1348-4540
DOI:10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0476