Comparative Study of Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Classification

The purpose of sentiment classification is to determine whether a particular document has a positive or negative nuance. Sentiment classification is extensively used in many business domains to improve products or services by understanding the opinions of customers regarding these products. Deep lea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2020, Vol.8, p.6861-6875
Hauptverfasser: Seo, Seungwan, Kim, Czangyeob, Kim, Haedong, Mo, Kyounghyun, Kang, Pilsung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of sentiment classification is to determine whether a particular document has a positive or negative nuance. Sentiment classification is extensively used in many business domains to improve products or services by understanding the opinions of customers regarding these products. Deep learning achieves state-of-the-art results in various challenging domains. With the success of deep learning, many studies have proposed deep-learning-based sentiment classification models and achieved better performances compared with conventional machine learning models. However, one practical issue occurring in deep-learning-based sentiment classification is that the best model structure depends on the characteristics of the dataset on which the deep learning model is trained; moreover, it is manually determined based on the domain knowledge of an expert or selected from a grid search of possible candidates. Herein, we present a comparative study of different deep-learning-based sentiment classification model structures to derive meaningful implications for building sentiment classification models. Specifically, eight deep-learning models, three based on convolutional neural networks and five based on recurrent neural networks, with two types of input structures, i.e., word level and character level, are compared for 13 review datasets, and the classification performances are discussed under different perspectives.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963426