Probing the neural dynamics of mnemonic representations after the initial consolidation

•Repeated retrieval strengthened consolidated memories, while repeated suppression had a modest negative effect.•Pattern reinstatements of individual memories were detected in the visual area, parietal lobe, and hippocampus after 24 h.•After repeated retrieval, reduced activity amplitude was associa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2020-11, Vol.221, p.117213-117213, Article 117213
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Wei, Kohn, Nils, Fernández, Guillén
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Repeated retrieval strengthened consolidated memories, while repeated suppression had a modest negative effect.•Pattern reinstatements of individual memories were detected in the visual area, parietal lobe, and hippocampus after 24 h.•After repeated retrieval, reduced activity amplitude was associated with increased distinctiveness of activity patterns in the ventral visual cortex and right precuneus.•Repeated suppression was associated with the reduced lateral prefrontal activity, but unchanged mnemonic representations. Memories are not stored as static engrams, but as dynamic representations affected by processes occurring after initial encoding. Previous studies revealed changes in activity and mnemonic representations in visual processing areas, parietal lobe, and hippocampus underlying repeated retrieval and suppression. However, these neural changes are usually induced by memory modulation immediately after memory formation. Here, we investigated 27 healthy participants with a two-day functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study design to probe how established memories are dynamically modulated by retrieval and suppression 24 h after learning. Behaviorally, we demonstrated that established memories can still be strengthened by repeated retrieval. By contrast, repeated suppression had a modest negative effect, and suppression-induced forgetting was associated with individual suppression efficacy. Neurally, we demonstrated item-specific pattern reinstatements in visual processing areas, parietal lobe, and hippocampus. Then, we showed that repeated retrieval reduced activity amplitude in the ventral visual cortex and hippocampus, but enhanced the distinctiveness of activity patterns in the ventral visual cortex and parietal lobe. Critically, reduced activity was associated with enhanced representation of idiosyncratic memory traces in the ventral visual cortex and precuneus. In contrast, repeated memory suppression was associated with reduced lateral prefrontal activity, but relative intact mnemonic representations. Our results replicated most of the neural changes induced by memory retrieval and suppression immediately after learning and extended those findings to established memories after initial consolidation. Active retrieval seems to promote episode-unique mnemonic representations in the neocortex after initial encoding but also consolidation.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117213