AN ANCIENT COIN HOARD DISCOVERED, FORGOTTEN, REDISCOVERED AND RECOVERED. THE JIDVEI HOARD CASE

This study deals with an unusual case of a coin hoard discovered by a metal detectorist in Jidvei, Alba County, recovered with judicial implications. The discoverer (a metal detector owner) approached the find thoughtfully, sparing it and proceeding with all the necessary legal and ethical steps, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 2024-03, Vol.10 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Marius-Mihai CIUTĂ, George BOUNEGRU
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study deals with an unusual case of a coin hoard discovered by a metal detectorist in Jidvei, Alba County, recovered with judicial implications. The discoverer (a metal detector owner) approached the find thoughtfully, sparing it and proceeding with all the necessary legal and ethical steps, thus ensuring a scientific documentation and complete recovery of the hoard and the context details. This story had a happy ending, although initial circumstances did not suggest such an outcome, especially since the responsible public institution for taking initial protective measures for the context, perimeter, and contents of the find completely ignored its legal obligations. This case highlights the potential for responsible metal detecting to contribute positively to archaeological discovery and heritage preservation when conducted in accordance with legal and ethical guidelines. Thus, 115 silver coins: 57 tetradrachms dating from the 3rd to 1st centuries BC (Macedonia Prima type - 2nd century BC); 51 Dacian drachms of the Rădulești-Hunedoara type (3rd-2nd century BC) and 7 roman denarii (Antoninianus type, 3rd century AD), were recovered and eventually became part of the collection of the Museum in Alba Iulia. The context of their origin was documented as efficiently as possible within a legal framework. This case highlights the risks to cultural heritage when the responsibilities stipulated by normative acts (such as OG 43/2000) are knowingly ignored by state institutions. It underscores the importance of adhering to legal and ethical standards in the handling of archaeological finds to protect and preserve cultural heritage. This situation emphasizes the need for updated legislation and strategies to effectively manage and regulate metal detecting activities in line with contemporary realities and technological advancements.
ISSN:2360-266X
DOI:10.14795/j.v10i4.972