Bone marrow stimulation for knee cartilage injuries—an international Delphi consensus statement

Articular cartilage injuries of the knee are a complex and challenging clinical pathology. The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for knee cartilage injuries. A consensus process on knee cartilage injuries utilizing a mod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of cartilage & joint preservation 2024-09, Vol.4 (3), p.100195, Article 100195
Hauptverfasser: Crook, Bryan S., Hurley, Eoghan T., Danilkowicz, Richard M., Erickson, Brandon J., Gobbi, Alberto, Goyal, Deepak, Lee, Cassandra A., Matzkin, Elizabeth, Strickland, Sabrina M., Parisien, Robert L., Hinckel, Betina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Articular cartilage injuries of the knee are a complex and challenging clinical pathology. The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for knee cartilage injuries. A consensus process on knee cartilage injuries utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Seventy-nine surgeons across 17 countries participated in these consensus statements. Fourteen questions were generated on BMS, with 3 rounds of questionnaires and final voting occurring. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was defined as 100% agreement with a proposed statement. Of the 14 total questions and consensus statements on BMS developed from 3 rounds of voting, 0 achieved unanimous consensus, 3 achieved strong consensus, 4 achieved consensus, and 7 did not achieve consensus. The statements that achieved strong consensus related to lesion site preparation, ability to differentiate healthy/damaged cartilage, and distance between BMS holes. The statements that did not achieve consensus were primarily related to the indications for BMS, as well as the instrumentation and whether orthobiologics/scaffolds should be utilized.
ISSN:2667-2545
2667-2545
DOI:10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100195