Repurposing Cefazolin-Avibactam for the Treatment of Drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Background: While tuberculosis (TB) is curable and preventable, the most effective first-line antibiotics cannot kill multi-drug resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ). Therefore, effective drugs are needed to combat MDR-TB, especially in children. Our objective was to repurpose cefazoli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in pharmacology 2021-10, Vol.12, p.776969-776969
Hauptverfasser: Srivastava, Shashikant, Gumbo, Tawanda, Thomas, Tania
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: While tuberculosis (TB) is curable and preventable, the most effective first-line antibiotics cannot kill multi-drug resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ). Therefore, effective drugs are needed to combat MDR-TB, especially in children. Our objective was to repurpose cefazolin for MDR-TB treatment in children using principles of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). Methods: Cefazolin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was identified in 17 clinical Mtb strains, with and without combination of the β-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam. Next, dose-ranging studies were performed using the intracellular hollow fiber model of TB (HFS-TB) to identify the optimal cefazolin exposure. Monte Carlo experiments were then performed in 10,000 children for optimal dose identification based on cumulative fraction of response (CFR) and Mtb susceptibility breakpoint in three age-groups. Results: Avibactam reduced the cefazolin MICs by five tube dilutions. Cefazolin-avibactam demonstrated maximal kill of 4.85 log 10  CFU/mL in the intracellular HFS-TB over 28 days. The % time above MIC associated with maximal effect (EC 80 ) was 46.76% (95% confidence interval: 43.04–50.49%) of dosing interval. For 100 mg/kg once or twice daily, the CFR was 8.46 and 61.39% in children
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.776969