Muscle Architecture Adaptations to Static Stretching Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Background Long-term stretching of human skeletal muscles increases joint range of motion through altered stretch perception and decreased resistance to stretch. There is also some evidence that stretching induces changes in muscle morphology. However, research is limited and inconclusive. Objective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sports Medicine - Open 2023-06, Vol.9 (1), p.47-27, Article 47
Hauptverfasser: Panidi, Ioli, Donti, Olyvia, Konrad, Andreas, Dinas, Petros C., Terzis, Gerasimos, Mouratidis, Athanasios, Gaspari, Vasiliki, Donti, Anastasia, Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Long-term stretching of human skeletal muscles increases joint range of motion through altered stretch perception and decreased resistance to stretch. There is also some evidence that stretching induces changes in muscle morphology. However, research is limited and inconclusive. Objective To examine the effect of static stretching training on muscle architecture (i.e., fascicle length and fascicle angle, muscle thickness and cross-sectional area) in healthy participants. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed Central, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus were searched. Randomized controlled trials and controlled trials without randomization were included. No restrictions on language or date of publication were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Subgroup analyses and random-effects meta-regressions were also performed using total stretching volume and intensity as covariates. Quality of evidence was determined by GRADE analysis. Results From the 2946 records retrieved, 19 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (n = 467 participants). Risk of bias was low in 83.9% of all criteria. Confidence in cumulative evidence was high. Stretching training induces trivial increases in fascicle length at rest (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI 0.01–0.33; p  = 0.042) and small increases in fascicle length during stretching (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.74; p  = 0.026). No increases were observed in fascicle angle or muscle thickness ( p  = 0.30 and p  = 0.18, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed that fascicle length increased when high stretching volumes were used ( p  
ISSN:2199-1170
2198-9761
2198-9761
DOI:10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7