Validation of the Chinese version stage of recovery instrument-30 (STORI-30) for adults with severe mental illness

Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as measuring recovery stage of people with mental illness. To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness. STORI-30 was translated to traditio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC psychiatry 2023-07, Vol.23 (1), p.485-485, Article 485
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Sharon Wing-Yung, Law, Colin Kwok-Man, Ng, Siu-Man
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stage of Recovery Instrument-30 (STORI-30) is grounded in a five-stage model of psychological recovery, and serves as measuring recovery stage of people with mental illness. To develop and validate the Chinese version STORI-30 on adults with severe mental illness. STORI-30 was translated to traditional Chinese through forward-backward method. An expert panel and potential users evaluated face validity and content validity. The Chinese version STORI-30 plus other convergent and divergent scales were then administered to 113 participants for field test. Face and content validity were confirmed with acceptable Content Validity Index and high inter-rater agreement. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure. An ordinal sequence was presented among the five subscales, similar to the original version. Construct validity was supported by positive correlations with recovery and mental well-being scales, and negative correlation with self-stigma scale. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.78-0.86) and high level of test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96) were obtained. Chinese STORI-30 presents satisfactory psychometric properties in internal consistency, construct convergent and divergent validity, and test-retest reliability. The three-factor structure revealed does not echo the original five-stage recovery model. Further studies exploring the underlying structure are warranted.
ISSN:1471-244X
1471-244X
DOI:10.1186/s12888-023-04954-y