Evaluation of radiation maculopathy after treatment of choroidal melanoma with ruthenium-106 using optical coherence tomography angiography

Background To assess the impact of brachytherapy on macular microvasculature utilizing optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in treated choroidal melanoma. Methods In this retrospective observational case series, we reviewed the recorded data of the patients with unilateral extramacular ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC ophthalmology 2021-11, Vol.21 (1), p.1-11, Article 385
Hauptverfasser: Torkashvand, Ali, Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid, Ghassemi, Fariba, Khalili Pour, Elias, Masoomian, Babak, Zarei, Mohammad, Fadakar, Kaveh, Arjmand, Mojtaba, Tayebi, Fereshteh, Ekradi, Leila, Abrishami Moghaddam, Hamid, Mahmoudi, Tahereh, Daneshmand, Reihaneh, Faghihi, Hooshang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To assess the impact of brachytherapy on macular microvasculature utilizing optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in treated choroidal melanoma. Methods In this retrospective observational case series, we reviewed the recorded data of the patients with unilateral extramacular choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium - 106 (.sup.106Ru) plaque radiotherapy with a follow-up period of more than 6 months. Automatically measured OCTA retinal parameters were analysed after image processing. Results Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients with the mean age of 51.1 years were recruited. Six eyes had no radiation maculopathy (RM). From 25 eyes with RM, nine eyes (36%) revealed a burnout macular microvasculature with imperceptible vascular details. Twenty-one non-irradiated fellow eyes from the enrolled patients were considered as the control group. Foveal and optic disc radiation dose had the highest value to predict the burnout pattern (ROC, AUC: 0.763, 0.727). Superficial and deep foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were larger in irradiated eyes in comparison to non-irradiated fellow eyes (1629 [mu]m.sup.2 vs. 428 [mu]m.sup.2, P = 0.005; 1837 [mu]m.sup.2 vs 268 [mu]m.sup.2, P = 0.021; respectively). Foveal and parafoveal vascular area density (VAD) and vascular skeleton density (VSD) in both superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP) were decreased in all irradiated eyes in comparison with non-irradiated fellow eyes (P < 0.001). Compared with non-irradiated fellow eyes, irradiated eyes without RM had significantly lower VAD and VSD at foveal and parafoveal DCP (all P < 0.02). However, these differences at SCP were not statistically significant. Conclusion The OCTA is a valuable tool for evaluating RM. Initial subclinical microvascular insult after .sup.106Ru brachytherapy is more likely to occur in DCP. The deep FAZ area was identified as a more critical biomarker of BCVA than superficial FAZ in these patients. Keywords: Deep capillary plexus, Foveal avascular zone (FAZ), Radiation maculopathy, Radiation retinopathy, Retina burnout, Ruthenium-106, Superficial capillary plexus
ISSN:1471-2415
1471-2415
DOI:10.1186/s12886-021-02140-w