research on 3D-printed composite PLGA and PDLLA-HA absorbable scaffolds for repairing radius defects in rabbits
Objectives Despite being an important research topic in oral biomaterials, few studies have demonstrated the differences between poly( d , l -lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA) and poly( d , l -lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite (PDLLA/HA). In this study, PLGA/HA and PDLLA/HA scaffolds were pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international medical research 2024-03, Vol.52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives Despite being an important research topic in oral biomaterials, few studies have demonstrated the differences between poly( d , l -lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA) and poly( d , l -lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite (PDLLA/HA). In this study, PLGA/HA and PDLLA/HA scaffolds were prepared using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and implanted into radius defects in rabbits to assess their effects on bone regeneration. Methods In this study, 6 mm × 4 mm bone defects were generated in the bilateral radii of rabbits. 3D-printed PLGA/HA and PDLLA/HA scaffolds were implanted into the defects. X-ray imaging, micro-computed tomography, and hematoxylin–eosin staining were performed to observe the degradation of the materials, the presence of new bone, and bone remodeling in the bone defect area. Results The PLGA/HA scaffolds displayed complete degradation at 20 weeks, whereas PDLLA/HA scaffolds exhibited incomplete degradation. Active osteoblasts were detected in both groups. The formation of new bone, bone marrow cavity reconstruction, and cortical bone remodeling were better in the PLGA/HA group than in the PDLLA/HA group. Conclusions PLGA/HA scaffolds performed better than PDLLA/HA scaffolds in repairing bone defects, making the former scaffolds more suitable as bone substitutes at the same high molecular weight. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1473-2300 |
DOI: | 10.1177/03000605241233418 |