Efficacy of Cervical Spine Mobilization Versus Peripheral Nerve Slider Techniques (Neurodynamics) in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cervical spine mobilization versus peripheral nerve slider techniques (neurodynamics) incervicobrachial pain syndrome. Study Design: The study design was arandomized interventional study. Place and Duration of Study: This study wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:J. Islamic Int. Med. Coll. 2015-12, Vol.10 (4), p.262-265
1. Verfasser: Muhammad Riaz Khan, Hina Shafi, Imran Amjad, Furqan Ahmed Siddiqui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cervical spine mobilization versus peripheral nerve slider techniques (neurodynamics) incervicobrachial pain syndrome. Study Design: The study design was arandomized interventional study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences (AFIRM), Rawalpindi from August 2014 to January 2015. Materials and Methods: Forty patients (n=40) were included by using purposive sampling technique. Patients of Age 30 to 60 years with Radiating neck pain, Limited ROM of neck and Pain persisting for more than 2 months, were included in study. Then randomly divided into two groups, each group contains 20 participants. One group was treated with neck mobilization and other was treated with neurodynamic treatment protocol. Pain and Active Range of Motion (AROM) was measured by Visual analog scale (VAS) and Inclinometer respectively. Neck Disability Index was also used. Patients were assessed before and after six week intervention. Data was analyzed on SPSS 20 and Independent t Test was used to compare the results of two groups. Results: Pain was measured on VAS, the mean of Mobilization and Neurodynamics were (2.0+1.892 vs. 4.8+2.397) respectively. There is significant (p
ISSN:1815-4018
2410-5422