Three bedside techniques to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background Dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation may develop in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to dynamic airway collapse and/or increased airway resistance, increasing the risk of volutrauma and hemodynamic compromise. The reference standard to quantify dynamic pulmonary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of intensive care 2021-12, Vol.11 (1), p.167-167, Article 167
Hauptverfasser: Roesthuis, L. H., van der Hoeven, J. G., Guérin, C., Doorduin, J., Heunks, L. M. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation may develop in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to dynamic airway collapse and/or increased airway resistance, increasing the risk of volutrauma and hemodynamic compromise. The reference standard to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation is the measurement of the volume at end-inspiration (Vei). As this is cumbersome, the aim of this study was to evaluate if methods that are easier to perform at the bedside can accurately reflect Vei. Methods Vei was assessed in COPD patients under controlled protective mechanical ventilation (7 ± mL/kg) on zero end-expiratory pressure, using three techniques in a fixed order: (1) reference standard (Vei reference ): passive exhalation to atmosphere from end-inspiration in a calibrated glass burette; (2) ventilator maneuver (Vei maneuver ): measuring the expired volume during a passive exhalation of 45s using the ventilator flow sensor; (3) formula (Vei formula ): (Vt ×  P plateau )/( P plateau  − PEEP i ), with Vt tidal volume, P plateau is plateau pressure after an end-inspiratory occlusion, and PEEP i is intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure after an end-expiratory occlusion. A convenience sample of 17 patients was recruited. Results Vei reference was 1030 ± 380 mL and had no significant correlation with P plateau ( r 2  = 0.06; P  = 0.3710) or PEEP i ( r 2  = 0.11; P  = 0.2156), and was inversely related with P drive (calculated as P plateau  −PEEP i ) ( r 2  = 0.49; P  = 0.0024). A low bias but rather wide limits of agreement and fairly good correlations were found when comparing Vei maneuver and Vei formula to Vei reference . Vei remained stable during the study period (low bias 15 mL with high agreement (95% limits of agreement from − 100 to 130 mL) and high correlation ( r 2  = 0.98; P  
ISSN:2110-5820
2110-5820
DOI:10.1186/s13613-021-00948-9