Plasma acylcarnitine and diabetic retinopathy: A study from Eastern China

Acylcarnitines (ACars) are important for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their roles in diabetic retinopathy (DR) remain controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of ACars with DR and their values in DR detection. This was a two-center case-control...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) 2022-10, Vol.13, p.977428-977428
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Dongzhen, Zhao, Shuzhen, Li, Huihui, Xia, Zhezheng, Che, Mingzhu, Huang, Ruogu, Lai, Mengyuan, Wang, Yanan, Zhang, Zejie, Wang, Hui, Zuo, Jingjing, Zheng, Chao, Mao, Guangyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acylcarnitines (ACars) are important for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, their roles in diabetic retinopathy (DR) remain controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of ACars with DR and their values in DR detection. This was a two-center case-control study based on the propensity score matching approach between August 2017 to June 2018 in Eastern China. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association of plasma ACars with DR. Differential ACars were screened by models of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, elastic net, and weighted quantile sum regression, and their roles in DR identification were further evaluated by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Eight of twenty plasma ACars (8:0, 12:0, 12:1, 14:1, 16:2, 18:0, 18:2 and 18:3) were associated with DR, while only ACar 8:0 was selected by three variable selection methods. As compared to those with the 1 tertile of ACar 8:0, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of DR were 0.22 (0.08, 0.59) and 0.12 (0.04, 0.36) for subjects in the 2 and 3 tertiles, respectively (P for trend < 0.001). Consistent associations were also observed in both restricted cubic spline regression models and subgroup analyses. AUC (95% CI) were 0.74 (0.66, 0.82) for ACar 8:0 alone and 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for ACar 8:0 combined with covariates. Our findings suggest higher ACar 8:0 is significantly associated with a decreased risk of DR, which provides a unique window for early identification of DR.
ISSN:1664-2392
1664-2392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.977428