QS1: Regret After Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Prevalence

PurposeThere is an unknown percentage of transgender and gender non-confirming individuals who undergo gender affirmation surgeries (GAS) that experiences regret. Regret could lead to physical and mental morbidity, also questioning the appropriateness of these procedures in selected patients. The ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2021-07, Vol.9 (7S), p.42-43
Hauptverfasser: Bustos, Valeria P., Bustos, Samyd S., Escandón, Joseph M., Mascaro, Andres, Del Corral, Gabriel, Gaxiola-García, Miguel Angel, Kushida-Contreras, Beatriz Hatsue, Langstein, Howard N., Manrique, Oscar J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PurposeThere is an unknown percentage of transgender and gender non-confirming individuals who undergo gender affirmation surgeries (GAS) that experiences regret. Regret could lead to physical and mental morbidity, also questioning the appropriateness of these procedures in selected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of regret in transgender individuals who underwent GAS and evaluate associated factors. MethodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive research strategy was performed including the following databasesOvid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, publication bias, and sensitivity analyses were performed. ResultsA total of 27 studies, pooling 7,928 transgender patients that underwent any type of GAS were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of regret after GAS was 1% (95% Confidence interval [CI]
ISSN:2169-7574
2169-7574
DOI:10.1097/01.GOX.0000770160.58231.17