Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy on treatment response and survival in patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review

•Photodynamic therapy effectiveness was systematically assessed in recurrent oral cancer•Photodynamic therapy attains favorable results and disease-free long-lasting periods•Complete responses were often achieved with Photofrin and Foscan as photosensitizers•Response depends on disease progression,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2024-08, Vol.48, p.104242, Article 104242
Hauptverfasser: Cardoso, Miguel, Marto, Carlos Miguel, Paula, Anabela, Coelho, Ana Sofia, Amaro, Inês, Pineiro, Marta, Pinho e Melo, Teresa M.V.D., Marques Ferreira, Manuel, Botelho, Maria Filomena, Carrilho, Eunice, Laranjo, Mafalda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Photodynamic therapy effectiveness was systematically assessed in recurrent oral cancer•Photodynamic therapy attains favorable results and disease-free long-lasting periods•Complete responses were often achieved with Photofrin and Foscan as photosensitizers•Response depends on disease progression, lesion location and treatment protocols This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Clinical studies on recurrent OSCC treated with PDT alone were included. Combined treatment strategies were excluded. The search was performed on Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov, manual search, and grey literature. The eleven included studies were observational. The risk of bias and methodological quality were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The studies reported the use of hematoporphyrin derivative, PhotofrinⓇ, FoscanⓇ and 5-aminolevulinic acid. Data on treatment response and survival was collected. Secondarily, postoperative courses and patient's quality of life/acceptance were reported whenever available. PhotofrinⓇ and FoscanⓇ were the most used photosensitisers, with more complete responses. Lesions responding less favourably were on posterior regions or deep-seated in the tissue. Although treatment response differs between treatment protocols, PDT stands as a viable treatment option to be considered, as it can achieve therapeutic results and disease-free, long-lasting periods. Partial treatment responses may be of interest when achieving eligibility for other treatment strategies. Despite this study's limitations, which considered four photosensitisers, PhotofrinⓇ was the most used but more recent photosensitisers like FoscanⓇ have greater chemical stability, tissue penetration, and may be more efficacious on recurrent OSCC.
ISSN:1572-1000
1873-1597
1873-1597
DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104242